Fragen?

m.riedl@
philosophando.com

the Good


For many centuries, humanity searched for it: the good.
But in the end it's easy to define it: the good := something that is without causing anything bad.
And sure: the bad, that's the consequences for at minimum one person, which are reducing her possibilities disproportionately (and even the risk of it, because even every dictator has to be afraid of his bodyguards, who can have the heroic idea to stop the injustice).
The good is the center of all human activity, but sadly it is very difficult to capture it in general. As a human being, our opinions are always subjective and this implies the possibility to have illusions. Hence many bad, hence non considered prudently ideas are handed down from one generation to the next.
E.g. it is an illusion to ignore the bad, as one preferes an easy going life and that seems to be possible for some time regionally, because the bad may have consequences for that person at that place later.
So the key for the good, that's education; in other words the procedure of acquiring insights to be able to orientate mentally without taking bad decisions. In its ideal, education can be realized by informing every person about potentially consequences of an idea or a point of view, if they appear less good than a known alternative.
The progress of humanity always took place because of philosophy and technology:
Now Reclue helps every person to live far closer to the perfect good, simply because there is less bad decisions taken.

Reclue organizes holistic rationality


For all sciences, the postulates of philosophy of science were already elaborated 100 years ago to avoid the already known illusions.
Inspired by M.Weber it is the aim of Reclue to increase the procedure of rationalization. According to J.Habermas this is possible via formalizing the sciences. According to R.Carnap this has to be done holistically. And according to W.Stegmüller the space of ideas can be metrified.
Through Reclue these ideas were combined and expanded to organise the discourse of humanity in a way, such that it takes place holistically rational, because the clarification of any contradiction is forced between each new proposal and the actual but changeable consensus in a depersonalized way. Hence a clear overview is created, as the loss of mental orientation (ex falso quodlibet) is avoided.
Hence the holistically better argument (ULTIMA RATIO TIONATAM), is created, which opens up:
  • extrapolate truth (which includes ideal justice)
  • prohibit damages and suffering
  • make solutions for problems accessible for every person (which will increase liberty [i.e. the number of options] implicitly)
  • a huge number of services will be simplified and reduce costs (e.g. automatically written algorithms)

the postulates of philosophy of rationality


openness

Holisticness

Describability

Every person always can assert everything.
Reclue will never be able to ignore something.
Every word, which has a meaning, refers on a concept (an idea), which is located exactly at one point in the space of concepts.

orientation

coherency

logics

The space of concepts is a highly dimensional metric space with an inductive ordered structure, whose peak is the concept itself: the completely undeterminable something.
All cogent classifications and all their aspects have to be taken in consideration, too.
Cogent expressions standing in contradiction may not be consensual at the same time, i.e. contradictions have to be clarified.
If there is a cogent argumentation, the conclusion has to be deduced.

falsifiability

empiricism

uniqueness of being

Every claim can be falsified by giving reasons.
Statements that can be tested by measurements must also be tested by measurement.
There is only one material reality, one optimal interpersonal world (with, for example, the coexistence of different cultures) and one personal truth per person - together only one absolute truth.

the consensi converge against the truth


The sufficient contribution to the clarification of the truth consists in the generation and preservation of the holistic rational consensus, as well as the organization of the clarification of all newly found contradictions.
This is achieved exclusively through argumentation theory, logic and abstract semantics and is realized as an algorithm. Thus, all content is open and it is preserved that the clear overview is not lost when mentally orienting oneself due to arbitrariness (ex falso quodlibet).
Any person who disagrees with an aspect of the current consensus can immediately start a discussion to cause its improvement.
In this case, Reclue will force a discussion between all persons responsible for the valid arguments and ideas which in concatenation caused Reclue to previously issue a contradiction.
This discussion either ends unanimously after a period of time, or all responsible persons are exchanged. Ideology fails.
In this way, the current consensus is improved and includes the knowledge of its users about everything.
From now on, this improved consensus will be used to warn all users about damage and illusions with reasons.
This way, each person is helped to get much closer to the good.

the realization of Reclue


The final steps are clear:
  1. the clarification of the terms (this is happening already)
  2. the translation of words into all languages (this is happening already)
  3. Reclue understands and speaks as well as necessary to be able to have a say in a subject area (here the work will be finished in a few weeks)
You can already benefit from Reclue: Download the app and try it as a beta tester. Every contribution (translation / clarification of terminology) will be registered and counted and fairly rewarded.
At the same time, the democratic party "Revolution Democracy" is created and will make the consensus be the content of politics.

genuine-democratic problem solving


genuine-democratic := the participation is open immediately for every person worldwide and thereby completely free. Everyone receives directly empirically-fair percentages at the reached. The better argument for the solution of the problem is thus implemented. Simply begin: reclue.com
I.e. for every person it is noted, what exactly he/she contributed (by description of content and not by monetary number inviting to fraud). Thus, the performance can be empirically recorded more precisely and recalculated at any time later, if the consensus about the estimation regarding the actual performance changes. So, whoever has let more or less of what is possible become an actually feasible option, has minimized risks and avoided damages, receives more shares in the world's prosperity - whereby everyone must receive a kind of basic income, in particular absolute chances for the perfection of his own person - i.e. access to any kind of education (feasible via Reclue.com), i.e. in particular his basic needs (protection against the weather, food, water, electricity, hygiene, medication, ...) covered.
The value of an idea is, for example, quantitatively unambiguously calculable per Reclue: It is in lexicographic arrangement a two-tuple of urgency*effectiveness/efficiency and the distance of the idea to previous solution approaches. Justice can thus be discussed objectively free of subjective preferences and hence realized.
Democracy is not feasible without justice, otherwise there is no cooperation and hence no sincerity in discourse.
The consensus is not only the agreement of a small group (or of some representatives), but the summary of opinions, which is open to changes for any person world-wide, and which at a time nobody can refute, although this is in no way somehow contentwisely prevented.
Therefore we support the Democratic Party of Germany: mit-rede.de
List of all genuine-democratic projects to solve problems:

Vortragsreihe zum Thema Rationalität: philosophando.com

contact


As far as possible we don't answer anything, as it doen't effectively help and costst time: m.riedl@ domain of philosophando.com


imprint


Philosophando UG, Martin Riedl, Florastrasse 21, 13187 Berlin