truth get's calculated

Described for maximum clarity using the terminology of analytic philosophy:

If there is a dissent with the existing consensus in the case of a statement by a user, the contradiction is found precisely and a reasoning is given.

Hence, one of the two participants in the discussion has to learn: that's the user, or Reclue.

If the reasoning behind the system is not plausible to the user, he can start a discussion with the people who are responsible for the component.

This discussion must come to a unanimous conclusion within a certain period of time.

If this does not happen, competent mediators in the mental environment are involved in the discussion.

If there is still no unanimous result after another deadline, all those responsible are replaced and lose their voting rights, because the possibility of ideological persistence would prevent clarification.

This algorithm is repeated until a unanimous result is found. Nevertheless, the same thing can be criticized again and again at any time.

The probability that statements that are closer to the truth deviate from it is much smaller than the opposite development.

Thus the consensus available to all persons for help converges under justified criticism against the absolute truth thus extrapolated.

Rationality is not a rule for just a few special sciences, but optimal for problem solving in all areas of life.

The progress of mankind is thus extremely accelerated in all areas of life.